This is the unfiltered truth — the full version of what happened behind the headlines.

If you’re here, it probably means you want to understand more than a soundbite. You may be doing your due diligence, or you’ve just heard pieces of the story. Either way, this page gives you everything: what really happened, why it mattered, and what had to be rebuilt from the ground up.

I’ve written the full account — about 8,000 words across 9 chapters — not to defend, but to document. To make visible what’s normally buried under assumptions, silence, or spin.

You have a few ways to explore it, depending on how deep you want to go:

If you want the clearest picture, read it from start to finish. It’s about a 30–40 minute read. No holding back.

Read the full story on Medium

Each of the 9 chapters focuses on a part of the journey. Whether you’re interested in what actually happened, how the legal process unfolded, or the system-level thinking that emerged from it — you can jump directly to that part.

👈️ See chapters in the left-hand menu.

Option 3 — For the “Give It to Me Fast” Crowd

If you don’t have time for the full 8,000-word version, or just want the high-level overview:
👇 You’ve got two options here:

⏱️ 1-Minute Version (TL;DR)

In 2022, I pled guilty in a $750M tax case.

The headlines made me a fraudster.

But I wasn’t hiding money — I was building a system.

It started with a working prototype:

A fully off-grid, biologically integrated, energy-positive home —

validated by scientists, supported by municipalities, and

structured to scale through a licensed infrastructure model.

The $750M valuation?

It was real — tied to long-term municipal savings.

The license was filed. The buyer was real. The project was declared.

But Revenu Québec didn’t ask questions.

They raided homes, warned the mayor — and killed the project.

Fighting back would’ve cost $300K+ and dragged my family through it.

So I pled guilty — not because I was, but because they wouldn’t listen.

Now, I’ve taken everything I learned — and I’m building what’s next:

A new internet layer rooted in trust.

Six patents. Ready to file.

This time, the architecture is protected — and the truth is public.

📎 Read the full story → Full Story

⏱️ 5-Minute Summary (With Evidence)

In 2022, I pled guilty to a tax fraud charge tied to a $750 million transaction. The media headlines painted me as a fraudster. But that was never the truth. What those stories omitted is what I spent the last years documenting.

I didn’t steal anything.

I built something.

I declared it — openly.

That’s what made me a target.

The Beginning & Prototype

It started with a favor: I built an off-grid, eco housing prototype for a friend.

The house worked — energy positive, self-sustaining, biologically filtered. That became proof: this model could scale to municipalities and reduce burden on water/sewer systems. In Part 3: The Prototype That Changed Everything, the images and system diagrams show the blueprint and built structure. 

Biologists validated the system. I collected signed letters: an official letter of support from an environmental biologist confirming the zero-waste performance of the water system appears in Part 2. 

We assembled a team: genomics, microbiology, engineering, policy — to prove scientifically this “house turned system” was not a fantasy.

Municipal Alignment & Economic Infrastructure

In Part 4, The Municipal Shift, you’ll find a document: an official letter of interest from a Quebec municipality. That letter confirms they were preparing to integrate this model into public infrastructure. 

Our model wasn’t selling homes — it was licensing an infrastructure system. In Part 5: The Economic Breakthrough, we show how the license model was designed to scale cities without burdening water/sewer systems. 

That license was valued at $750M — based on municipal impact, infrastructure savings, and long-term alignment. Everything was documented, structured, and aligned — the license documents were filed, contracts drafted, and valuation models prepared.

Collapse & Government Intervention

Then, in Part 6: The Collapse, the system was working. The license was in motion. A buyer was ready. A city was aligned. Then Revenu Québec agents showed up with no warning.

I allowed them to see the prototype, show the documents. Among what they saw:

• The signed letter from the biologist

• The mayor’s alignment

• The licensing structure

• The path to municipal integration

• The valuation logic

• Internal messages and structure of Logeit™ / EcoGo™ models

• Official letters from government supporters, including those from Assemblée Nationale (Part 1) 

But instead of investigations or requests for clarity, they closed the narrative. They leaked to the mayor, warning him. The pilot plans, plots, and alignment evaporated. The buyer backed away. The team scattered.

They didn’t ask follow-up questions. They didn’t cross-check. They made a narrative decision. The work was buried.

In Part 8: Why I Pled Guilty, charges landed not only on the company but personally on me — despite all evidence that the license was declared, the prototype existed, the buyer was real, and no funds were missing. 

They focused on the sales tax refund request in that transaction. Because that was the only “line” they had. But as I show, the transaction was fully declared under counsel, with clear documentation, and tied to real infrastructure work. 

What The Proofs Show

Throughout the story, you will see:

• Official letters: from the Assemblée Nationale, environmental biologists, municipal officials

• Images & diagrams: of the prototype habitat, system schematics, control units

• Government entity involvement: letters of support, municipal alignment, plot planning

• Contract & legal documents: license structuring, valuation models, public-facing declarations

• Internal signals: texts, memos, messages that show transparency in operations

Each of these appears in its corresponding part of the story — e.g. in Part 1 some of the official letters and press framing; Part 2 & 3 system diagrams; Part 4 municipal letters; Part 6 government agents and home raids; Part 8 legal declarations.

What I Learned & What Matters

I didn’t lose because the system failed. I lost because the system refused nuance.

Because they needed a headline.

Because “fraud” was easier than understanding infrastructure.

I lost because I believed truth would stand on its own.

But systems are not built for nuance. They are built for control, imagery, and narrative.

But that loss became my foundation.

What Comes Next — Plethora

What I’m building now, Plethora, is informed by every failure, every document scanned, every letter suppressed.

It’s not just a platform. It’s architecture to align trust, protect value, and rebuild systems that don’t collapse under narrative.

You don’t need to believe me. The document of the full story, the letters, and the proofs are there.

Read them. Track them. Judge them. But don’t skip over them.

This isn’t about clearing my name. It’s about telling the real story.

Now the tool must match the integrity. And Plethora is that tool.

📎 Read the full story → Full Story